Deportation Petition Filed Against Obama by Freedom Watch, as Predicted by AUN-TV

Deportation Petition Filed Against Obama by Freedom Watch, as Predicted by AUN-TV

As predicted by AUN-TV, when we broke the story that this was brewing,  Freedom Watch’s Larry Klayman has filed a deportation petition against President Barack Obama.  This should not be taken lightly as Klayman won a big case against the NSA, for spying on Americans, less than a year ago.  That is one of the biggest legal cases won against the federal government in recent history.

For background on this case, here is the AUN-TV article predicting this legal move was coming:
As AUN-TV guessed, Obama’s forged documents are a key reason for the petition.   Below we will provide a link to the entire documentation by Freedom Watch.

(Washington, D.C. October 3, 2014). Today, Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, and a former U.S. Justice Department prosecutor, announced that he has filed a deportation petition against President Barack Obama, on the grounds that he has falsified various birth and other documents with regard to obtaining a U.S. passport and other privileges as an alleged American citizen. A copy of the petition with supporting documentation can be found at Klayman issued the following statement upon filing the petition, which calls for an investigation and a full evidentiary hearing by immigration authorities of the Department of Homeland Security.”It is clear, based on a mountain of evidence as set forth in and attached to the petition, that the President and his agents have falsified documents, such as his birth certificate and social security number, to qualify for the privileges of American citizenship such that his citizenship, which is based on false pretenses, must be nullified. As set forth in the petition, this includes but is not limited to the fraudulent production of a computer- generated facsimile of an official state of Hawaiian birth certificate. Even if a legitimate birth certificate exists, Obama’s repeated use of a clearly forged birth certificate is still a crime and in violation of the law. While this deportation proceeding may seem to some to be the work of conservatives who are out to get the President, this is not the case. Barack Obama’s propensity to not tell the truth is now well known, even among his leftist supporters. And, his actions while President belie someone whose actions show that he feels more kinship with his foreign roots and Muslim religious schooling and heritage, than the Judeo-Christian principles upon which this nation was founded. I thus urge everyone to read and digest this petition to have him deported and remove him from the United States, before dismissing it.”

For more information contact Freedom Watch at

(424) 274-2579 or

News Flash: Klayman Files Petition to Have Obama Deported from U.S. For Falsifying Birth Documents, Etc.

View Full Petition

EXHIBIT F: The book by Dr. Jerome Corsi, Where’s the Birth Certificate?: The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President (April 17, 2011)

Exhibit G: The “e-book” titled Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?, which addresses the latest information

Exhibit H: E-book by Dr. Jerome Corsi with Michael Zullo, A Question of Eligibility: A Law Enforcement Investigation into Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate and His Eligibility to be President, (Feb 29, 2012)

Exhibit “I”: Videos that can be accessed on YouTube at:

  1. This is exciting news. It should shake Washington to it’s core. Will it help the
    Republicans or hurt them? I’m sure Klayman put a lot of thought into that question
    before he decided when he would file this.
    Congratulations Dana, this is a big story.

    • Thank you. I knew about Paula Jones 3 months before it was ever in newspapers. Reporters went to her press conference, just like Arpaio’s, but censored it. It was when the lawsuit for sexual harassment was filed that papers finally mentioned Jones, and it went to Supreme Court. This lawsuit may have same effect, hard to say.

  2. This NOT a “lawsuit.” Nor is it a “petition.” It’s simply a letter to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security asking for an “investigation” that will be summarily ignored and round filed. The Department is under no obligation to respond to Mr. Klayman’s letter.

    There is no such things as a “Petition for Administrative Action to Convene an Investigation and Hearing” for deportation matters. This is something Larry Klayman just made up out of thin air.

    What’s really hilarious about this is that Klayman’s “evidence” is just Jerome Corsi’s birther books and he doesn’t even provide copies of these with his letter. Instead he lists links to WND’s “Superstore” and invites Homeland Security staff to purchase their own copies there to read.

    Birthers are truly a gullible lot.

    • It is NOT a letter. It is a Petition to the Head of the Agency. The Petition is the beginning of the Administrative Process which is required prior to initiating a lawsuit or a writ to compel the production of original documents requested. Your attempt to minimize the seriousness of the investigation, and the the Arizona Sheriff Arpio and his crew who traced and collected the evidence – so far – are honorable men who believe in the law and the OATH they took. Let us not forget that when pressured OVOMIT did not, on his own, produce legitimate documents… no he decided not to provide legitimate government documents but instead opted to post the poor quality forged “STATE” document. That is a crime. Like it said in the article, ” Doesn’t matter if he has a certified true copy of the original birth certificate”, and that is because he knowingly, willingly and intentionally choose to provide the American People with a phony.

      • Very well put Tuaca. AND unless what Arpaio and team is true, they could be arrested for fraud and obstruction of justice.

      • Tuaca, if it’s a “crime” why is it that after three years of “investigation” no charges have ever been filed? Not a single warrant, subpoena or criminal charge has resulted from Arpaio’s so-called cold case posse “investigation.”

        As to Klayman’s “Petition” that’s his term and not one used by immigration enforcement statutes. There is no provision for a private citizen to “Petition for Administrative Action to Convene an Investigation and Hearing” for deportation matters. A citizen can file a complaint, but the agency has full discretion to determine whether or not that complaint has sufficient merit to warrant an investigation.

        Given that the State of Hawaii has already formally validated Obama’s LFBC on as authentic and accurate, the Department of Homeland Security has no course of action pending other than to toss Klayman’s “complaint.” They don’t even need to dignify Klayman’s letter with a response.


  3. After watching the original Arpio news conference, and downloading the birth certificate myself from the .gov site, I believe the evidence is overwhelming, the birth certificate is in fact a forged document. I would think that people with average intelligence, even Democrats would actually research this to at least argue the facts, and not look so foolish in the face of the verifiable evidence. Name calling such as “birthers” is not a very informed argument against anything, except for small children.

    • Don: Obama’s birth certificate is not forged.

      With the single exception of Reed Hayes, who has not proven his expertise in examining digital documents (he is a specialist in documents on paper, and he has not seen the paper copies) and who admits he has not seen the research on the way that the Xerox WorkCentre works, ONLY birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged. And they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

      One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

      Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

      And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

      Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

      Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

      And the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly stated that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that ALL the facts on the published copy are exactly the same as on what they sent him.

      And it is irrational (to say the very least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

      Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.


Leave a Reply to alg Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.