Wisconsin Recount Confirms Trump, But Harvard Study Says Illegal Alien Voter Fraud Passed Obamacare

Wisconsin Recount Confirms Trump, But Harvard Study Says Illegal Alien Voter Fraud Passed Obamacare

Completed Wisconsin recount widens Donald Trump’s lead by 131 votes.

Wisconsin’s historic presidential recount ended Monday resulting in a net gain of 131 votes for President-elect Donald Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton, the Wisconsin Elections Commission said.

Trump added 844 votes to his total for the Nov. 8 election, while Clinton added 713.

Overall, the commission said, voters cast 2.976 million ballots. The recount resulted in a net increase of 837 ballots.

“Completing this recount was a challenge, but the real winners are the voters,” Elections Commission Chairman Mark Thomsen said in a statement after signing off on the statewide results. “Based on the recount, they can have confidence that Wisconsin’s election results accurately reflect the will of the people, regardless of whether they are counted by hand or by machine.”

The last statewide recount, in a 2011 Supreme Court race, resulted in a net change of 312 votes for the top two candidates out of 1.5 million ballots cast.

But does this mean voter fraud does not happen? No

Do illegal votes cast by non-citizens decide elections?

In a forthcoming article in the Journal of Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.

Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote.

Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens
2008 2010
Self reported and/or verified 38 (11.3%) 13 (3.5%)
Self reported and verified 5 (1.5%) N.A.
Adjusted estimate 21 (6.4%) 8 (2.2%)

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.

Washington Post Article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election/


This may help explain the major victory by Republicans in 2014. This Harvard study shows 6.4% of Illegals vote in presidential elections and only 2.2% in off years.  2008 and 2012 were good for Democrats and 2010 and 2014 were good for Republicans.  Just this type of voter fraud alone, wins many elections.  Democrats it would appear are dependent on voter fraud.

If there are 8,000,000 adult illegal aliens in the USA, 6.4% of them is 512,000.   Over 80% vote Democrat according to the study. So using a conservative 80% that is 409,600 votes or a net gain of 307,200 votes for Democrats.

In the case of Al Franken he was the deciding vote for the unpopular ObamaCare law.  The implications of this fact are profound.  Since there is no doubt that criminal voter fraud by illegals in Minnesota would produce far more than 312 votes.  Pew Research determined at the time there were 95,000 illegal aliens in Minnesota.  If 75% are over 18 years old that means there are 71,250 voting age illegal aliens.  On average that translates into 9,975 illegally registered to vote (14% see fourth paragraph), so in 2008 when Franken ran he would receive about 4,417 extra illegal votes (using conservative figure that 80% go to Democrats).  His Republican opponent would have received about 833 extra illegal votes, which means a net gain for Franken of 3,534.  That means Franken lost the election by 3,222 votes and was never legally elected a US Senator. 

The bottom line is that ObamaCare was passed against the American people’s will by Al Franken, the deciding vote, who lost his election by 3,222 votes.   Criminal voter fraud in Minnesota overturned the real result creating what American see as a disaster, ObamaCare.  This helps explain why Democrats go out of their way to encourage illegal aliens to flood across the southern border and discourage measures that prevent voter fraud.  The Democrat Party if very benefited by voter fraud as this article documents.

In private conversations, some of which have been secretly videotaped, Democrat Party operatives are very open about wanting and practicing voter fraud.  The other forms of voter fraud may account for even more votes than illegals voting.  James O’Keefe has videotaped many known Democrat officials encouraging voter fraud.  You can view those videos on the below stories.

There are cases of Republican voter fraud too, but in 2014 the fast majority that have been exposed, have been Democrat voter fraud. 



Hidden Cameras, Actors and James O’Keefe Prove Voter Fraud in North Carolina Okay With Dems

Blatant Efforts by Workers for Democrat Senate Candidate Kay Hagan to Encourage Illegal Aliens to Vote With the number of senate races that could chan…


Massive Non-Citizen Voting Uncovered in Maryland

An election integrity watchdog group is suing the state of Maryland, alleging that it has discovered massive and ongoing fraudulent voting by non-U.S….

Attorney General Eric Holder Switches Sides, Unilaterally Enforces Voter ID In State Without Voter ID Law!

Attorney General Eric Holder Switches Sides, Unilaterally Enforces Voter ID In State Without Voter ID Law!

President Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder is one of the chief national advocates for no voter ID laws and is against other safeguards to prevent voter fraud. He has publicly stated that there is no voter fraud.

In fact not only has Eric Holder been opposed to voter ID, as the AG he has used federal power  to strike down state passed voter ID laws.  To say Eric Holder was the number one enemy of Voter ID laws in America would be hard to argue with.

Holder has even said on camera that “Voter Fraud does not exist in America.”

It has now been learned that on Holder’s direction a severe form of Voter ID was implemented at a location without a Voter ID law.  Holder saw to it that the poll officials would have photos to match to voters before the voters came in to vote.    This reporter has never observed this practice, it is much more severe than poll officials just making sure voters have a driver’s license or  Social Security card.

What brought about this 180 degree reversal by Eric Holder?  The entire story of Holder’s conversion has been captured on camera, which you can view below.   This article will make no sense unless you watch the entire video.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *