The following is in the Financial Times. It is obviously written by a globalist to promote globalism and globalists.
This is what they want you think they are up to, not necessarily what the are actually up to:
December 30, 2015 5:24 pm
Why globalisers still retain the upper hand
In her recent unsuccessful campaign during France’s regional elections, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the far-right National Front, argued repeatedly that international politics is increasingly pitting nationalists against globalists. In this respect, if few others, Mrs Le Pen is correct. All over the world, globalisation is under challenge from resurgent nationalist forces. One of the great political challenges of the coming year will be to defend the benefits of globalisation — while fending off the arguments of nationalists such as Mrs Le Pen, Donald Trump in the US and his new admirer, President Vladimir Putin of Russia.
The benefits of globalisation are both economic and political. In economic terms, they include enhanced global trade and international investment, which boost prosperity and enlarge choice for ordinary people. Believers in globalisation are more interested in opening borders than closing them. Globalisation is closely linked to internationalism in politics, since it involves a recognition that the world faces common problems, such as climate change or refugees, that can only be dealt with effectively through international agreements.
Defenders of globalisation cannot simply dismiss the concerns that are driving voters towards nationalists. Rising inequality is an important issue in the US, the EU, and even China. But the causes are complex and involve technology and education, as much as international trade. Similarly, it would be a mistake simply to wave away popular concerns about mass migration. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/707a1500-a415-11e5-873f-68411a84f346.html#axzz3vq4cO6fY